courts

Ashleigh Lynn Bent v Yuksel Ceper [2026] NSWSC 788

Supreme Court of New South Wales - [2026] NSWSC 788

By Daily Sydney Courts · Published 20 July 2026

How we reported this

Produced with AI assistance and reviewed against our editorial standards. Sources are linked where available. Spotted an error or need a correction? Contact [email protected].

The Supreme Court of New South Wales has delivered judgment in Ashleigh Lynn Bent v Yuksel Ceper [2026] NSWSC 788.

Case details

Citation: [2026] NSWSC 788

Decision date: 2026-07-07

Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales

Catchwords

EVIDENCE, Hearsay, Exceptions, whether affidavit evidence is admissible under s 63(2) of the Evidence Act pursuant to a direction under s 67(4) of the Evidence Act, HELD, requirement to provide notice dispensed with and direction made pursuant to s 67(4) of the Evidence Act for hearsay exception to apply

Read the judgment

This judgment is published on the official court website. Read the full judgment here.

This record links to the official court source only. The full judgment text is not republished here.

References Sourced but Not Limited to:

caselaw.nsw.gov.au

Your newsroom. Shaped by you.

The Daily Sydney is in beta. AI may assist with research, summarising and drafting. Automated checks assess sourcing, accuracy and editorial risk before publication, and sensitive material is held for human review. Spotted something off, or want us covering a topic? Tell us. Your feedback is entirely optional and helps shape what we publish next.