The Daily Sydney

Sydney news, every day

News

Duplicate Images in Sydney's Housing Records Are Costing Councils Time and Money, Officials Say

From Parramatta to Pyrmont, planners and property experts are calling for urgent reform as duplicated digital images clog development applications and slow an already strained approvals pipeline.

By Sydney News Desk · Published 5 July 2026, 5:00 am

3 min read

Duplicate Images in Sydney's Housing Records Are Costing Councils Time and Money, Officials Say
Photo: various / Public domain (Wikimedia Commons)

Sydney's planning bureaucracy is sitting on a growing problem: thousands of development applications lodged each year contain duplicate images — the same photograph, floor plan or site diagram uploaded multiple times — jamming document management systems at councils already struggling to process a record volume of housing applications. Planning professionals, data managers and local government officials have spent months flagging the issue, and pressure is now mounting for a coordinated fix.

The timing matters. NSW is in the middle of its most ambitious housing push in decades. The state government's Housing Acceleration Fund targets 377,000 new homes across Greater Sydney by 2029, and the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure has made faster DA processing a centrepiece of that effort. Duplicate image files — which can multiply document sizes by two to five times — are undermining that goal at the ground level, according to people working inside the system.

Where the Problem Is Worst

Cumberland Council in Western Sydney and the City of Parramatta are among the local government areas bearing the heaviest load. Both sit inside the Priority Precinct zones designated under the Minns government's Transport Oriented Development program, announced in April 2023, which rezones land within 400 metres of 37 train stations for higher-density housing. Application volumes in those areas have surged. Council document portals — most of which use the NSW Planning Portal, administered by the Department of Customer Service — are receiving submissions where a single DA can run to several hundred pages, with image duplication a persistent contributor to file bloat.

The issue is not purely a storage headache. When case officers at Parramatta Square — where the City of Parramatta Council operates out of its civic building on Darcy Street — open a 450-page DA and find the same rooftop photograph on pages 38, 112 and 204, it slows review time. Property data firms working with councils on document classification say automated deduplication tools already exist in commercial imaging software but are not yet integrated into the NSW Planning Portal's submission workflow.

Sydney-based spatial data consultancies, including several operating out of the Australian Technology Park in Eveleigh, have been in contact with state planning officials about the feasibility of building image-hash detection — a technique that assigns each image a unique digital fingerprint — directly into the portal's upload interface. The approach is already used by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission for its company document portal, where file integrity checks happen before a submission is accepted.

What Would a Fix Actually Look Like?

The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure has not publicly committed to a timeline for portal upgrades addressing duplicate content. Industry submissions to the department's Planning Portal Improvement Consultation, which closed in March 2026, raised document quality as a priority. The Urban Development Institute of Australia's NSW chapter noted in its February 2026 policy paper that DA processing times in Greater Sydney averaged 78 days for residential applications — well above the statutory 40-day target for most categories.

Practical options on the table include mandatory file-size caps per DA submission, client-side deduplication prompts built into the portal's upload screen, and a post-lodgement automated audit that flags duplicate images for applicants to remove before a case officer opens the file. Each option carries trade-offs. Hard file-size limits risk penalising legitimate large-scale applications for apartment towers in growth corridors like the Sydenham to Bankstown Urban Renewal Corridor. Voluntary prompts depend on applicants — often individual home renovators rather than professional consultants — actually responding to them.

For now, council planning officers are managing with manual workarounds. Some have adopted internal checklists that flag obvious duplication before a file is assigned to a case officer. Others are running retrospective audits on pending applications, particularly those tied to State Significant Development pathways where the Planning Secretary's office in Parramatta handles assessment directly.

The practical advice coming from those inside the system is consistent: applicants using the NSW Planning Portal should run their PDF packages through a deduplication tool — Adobe Acrobat's Reduce File Size function or free equivalents — before lodging. It won't solve the systemic gap, but it will keep individual applications from stalling at the first desk they hit.

Topic:#News

How does this story make you feel?

Spread the word

See something wrong? Suggest a correction.

Have your say

Loading comments…

Sources

About this article

Published by The Daily Sydney

This article was produced by the The Daily Sydney editorial desk and covers news in Sydney. See our editorial standards for how we use AI.

The Daily Sydney brief

The day's Sydney news in a 2-minute read, every weekday morning. Free.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Sydney and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Daily brief

Enjoyed this? Wake up to Sydney news every morning.

Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Sydney and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

More from The Daily Sydney

More in News

Enjoyed this story? Get tomorrow's briefing free.