The Daily Sydney

Sydney news, every day

Property

Neighbours vs Developers: The Fight Over Sydney's Next Big Build

As Sydney wrestles with a housing shortfall measured in the tens of thousands, the battle lines between residents and developers have never been drawn more sharply — and both sides have a point.

By Sydney Property Desk · Published 4 July 2026, 10:46 pm

3 min read

Neighbours vs Developers: The Fight Over Sydney's Next Big Build
Photo: Photo by Georgios Tsatas on Pexels

A development application lodged with the City of Sydney council in late June for a nine-storey mixed-use tower on Parramatta Road at Leichhardt has drawn more than 140 objections in three weeks — one of the highest submission counts for any single DA in the inner west this year. The project, which would deliver 87 apartments above ground-floor retail, sits within a precinct the NSW government flagged for uplift under its Transport Oriented Development program back in late 2023. That designation means the state can override local controls. Residents are furious. Planners say the site is exactly the kind of place density should go.

The clash is playing out across dozens of Sydney suburbs simultaneously. The NSW government's housing target — 377,000 new dwellings by 2029, as set out in the Housing and Productivity Contribution framework — is not being met. Completions in the 12 months to March 2026 fell roughly 18 per cent short of the annual run rate needed to hit that number. Migration-driven demand is running hot, Sydney's median house price sits around $1.4 million, and rental vacancy in the inner ring is below one per cent. Pressure to build is acute.

What Residents Are Actually Saying

The objections landing at council chambers are not simply reflexive NIMBYism, though some of that exists. At a packed community meeting held at the Leichhardt Town Hall on June 21, residents raised specific, documented concerns: the proposal's shadow diagrams show the proposed tower would cast neighbouring properties on nearby Marion Street into shade for more than four hours on the winter solstice. The site's traffic impact assessment, critics argue, underestimates vehicle movements by failing to account for the existing bottleneck at the Norton Street intersection. The Leichhardt Precinct Committee, which has been active since the 1970s, submitted a 23-page technical rebuttal to the DA, not a petition of vague complaint.

Heritage is another live wire. The inner west holds some of Sydney's most intact Federation and interwar streetscapes. Residents point to comparable situations elsewhere — the drawn-out fight over a proposed 12-storey block in Newtown's King Street precinct, which the Land and Environment Court eventually reduced to six storeys in April 2025 after heritage consultants commissioned by Marrickville Legal Centre raised substantive concerns. That ruling, they argue, shows the system can and does listen when objections are grounded in evidence.

The Developer and Planner Counterargument

The other side of the ledger is harder to dismiss. The Urban Taskforce Australia, which represents major developers, published modelling in May showing that Sydney needs to add roughly 1,100 new dwellings per week through to 2030 just to stabilise the rental market. It is not doing that. The Northern Beaches and Inner West — precisely the areas generating the most opposition — are among the highest-demand, lowest-supply corridors in the metropolitan area. Blocking an 87-apartment building in Leichhardt does not protect housing affordability. It worsens it.

The TOD program was specifically designed to short-circuit drawn-out local battles. Sites within 400 metres of train stations — including Leichhardt's proximity to the planned Metro West corridor — are meant to receive fast-tracked approvals. Planners at the Greater Cities Commission argue that without mandatory state-level intervention, individual councils default to protection of existing residents over prospective ones. The statistics back them: according to the commission's own 2025 development pipeline audit, inner-city councils approved just 62 per cent of residential DAs within the statutory 40-day window last financial year.

The Leichhardt DA now moves to an independent planning panel hearing scheduled for August 14. That body sits above council and can approve against local objections. Residents intending to make submissions should note the panel accepts written evidence until August 5 via the NSW Planning Portal. For anyone watching a similar fight unfold in their own street — Glebe, Balmain, Dulwich Hill and Rozelle all have contested DAs in the current cycle — the Leichhardt case will set a tone. The panel's decision will be read closely by both sides.

Topic:#Property

How does this story make you feel?

Spread the word

See something wrong? Suggest a correction.

Have your say

Loading comments…

About this article

Published by The Daily Sydney

This article was produced by the The Daily Sydney editorial desk and covers property in Sydney. See our editorial standards for how we use AI.

The Daily Sydney brief

The day's Sydney news in a 2-minute read, every weekday morning. Free.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Sydney and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Daily brief

Enjoyed this? Wake up to Sydney news every morning.

Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Sydney and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

More from The Daily Sydney

More in Property

Enjoyed this story? Get tomorrow's briefing free.